The capture of the medical profession by its suppliers: Vaccine hesitancy explained

Open letter to Sean Plunket on the 9 disturbing flaws in the Platform’s supposed ‘debunking’ of Liz Gunn’s MOAR. These flaws are: 1.        Its title is “A real expert explains why Liz Gunn’s MOAR is a complete crock”. Are those words indicative of dispassionate work objectively assessing fact? Clearly, they are not. How can one get more real than the expert who developed and administered the site? One doesn’t need to look beyond the emotional, sensationalist title to know that this will be a typical ‘fact checker’ hit piece, clutching at and twisting whatever straws might be available, placing agenda/ damage control via character assassination above any other consideration. 2.        It was full of head shaking, derogatory pejoratives about those disbelieving the government narrative, no doubt pandering to his audience, but without consideration that democracy is supposed to be about the contest of opinions, and not abou...

  COVID-19 Debate between cardiologist Dr Daniel and suspended Dr William Bay on Café Locked Out 8-8-23 This debate can be found at https://cafelockedout.com/videos/ - go to 8/8/2023. It’s 147 minutes. I will comment within my areas of qualification and experience, leaving the points of medical contention to be addressed by medicos such as Billy, Chris Neil and My-Le Trinh who was commenting during the debate. I nevertheless note that this video https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/big-picture-interview-by-james-patrick , from inside the medical R&D industry in the US, seems to conclusively addresses several of the medical issues raised. I first acknowledge Daniel’s courage in addressing a hostile audience. I also acknowledge his intent of patient care and seeking truth. I do however think he has a substantial way to go in achieving those goals and that he has been seriously mislead. I also think any serious debate, seeking other than a frivolous contest, needs to result in de...

This blog considers legislation before Queensland Parliaments (Part 1) before considering legislation before the Western Australian Parliament (Part 2). It finds significant difficulties and concludes that all legislation relating to COVID-19 currently before any parliament in Australia must be voted down to avoid loss of country, state and individual autonomy/ sovereignty. This conclusion is based upon the principle that coercive control of one entity by another, whether state, corporate or individual, does not advance the common good and is open to nefarious manipulation by external actors. ‘Common good’ that harms any/ many is not for the common good. [Note: The Queensland legislation may be voted on in the Queensland Parliament on 11 October. I suggest people throughout the state email the link to this blog to their local member (whatever their party) and make an appointment to go see them about it before then, to bring it to their attention, overviewing it for them and urgin...