Posts

  Bay v AHPRA - Avoiding administrative coups The Supreme Court decision Bay v Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency [2024] QSC 315 on Friday 13 December 2024 was highly significant for the whole country, as it effectively put the brakes on bureaucracy getting out of control, acting outside the law and the constitution and carrying on with misplaced ideological, moralistic zeal, acting as Judge, Jury and executioner. It reaffirmed the need for separation of powers in our democratic governance. Justice Bradley simply asserted the authority of the courts and the law, which we all, including AHPRA need to abide by. AHPRA exceeded these bounds so grossly that the Judge didn’t even need to get into (the now well-researched and documented dangers of, or the fraud surrounding) the C-19 jabs. Our system is supposed to guard against the tyranny of groupthink inducing summary emotion-based action by ideological hot-heads, turning democracy into tyranny. It has finally delivere...
  RIP Mainstream Media Investigative Journalism Isn’t it strange how "died suddenly" has been normalised as a cause of death? And no mainstream media (msm) reporter dares give any further detail about the underlying cause? How is it that our medicos and scientists have cracked the genetic code and know everything about the body and the brain, such that we can rush towards GMOs and transhumanism, yet they can’t tell us the elementary medical basics of why people are dying, or why we have an explosion in excess deaths? It seems we are supposed to believe that the medical profession, with all its incredibly sophisticated tools, is completely puzzled and can only put it down to “died suddenly” or SADS (Sudden Adult Death Syndrome)! This makes our medicos look like incompetent fools! It’s just not credible! It doesn’t pass the pub test! Why aren’t our msm journalists jumping all over this? Did none of them put two and two together? Didn't journalists once delight in aski...
Open letter to Sean Plunket on the 9 disturbing flaws in the Platform’s supposed ‘debunking’ of Liz Gunn’s MOAR. These flaws are: 1.        Its title is “A real expert explains why Liz Gunn’s MOAR is a complete crock”. Are those words indicative of dispassionate work objectively assessing fact? Clearly, they are not. How can one get more real than the expert who developed and administered the site? One doesn’t need to look beyond the emotional, sensationalist title to know that this will be a typical ‘fact checker’ hit piece, clutching at and twisting whatever straws might be available, placing agenda/ damage control via character assassination above any other consideration. 2.        It was full of head shaking, derogatory pejoratives about those disbelieving the government narrative, no doubt pandering to his audience, but without consideration that democracy is supposed to be about the contest of opinions, and not abou...
  COVID-19 Debate between cardiologist Dr Daniel and suspended Dr William Bay on Café Locked Out 8-8-23 This debate can be found at https://cafelockedout.com/videos/ - go to 8/8/2023. It’s 147 minutes. I will comment within my areas of qualification and experience, leaving the points of medical contention to be addressed by medicos such as Billy, Chris Neil and My-Le Trinh who was commenting during the debate. I nevertheless note that this video https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/big-picture-interview-by-james-patrick , from inside the medical R&D industry in the US, seems to conclusively addresses several of the medical issues raised. I first acknowledge Daniel’s courage in addressing a hostile audience. I also acknowledge his intent of patient care and seeking truth. I do however think he has a substantial way to go in achieving those goals and that he has been seriously mislead. I also think any serious debate, seeking other than a frivolous contest, needs to result in de...

Problems with health legislation in Australia

This blog considers legislation before Queensland Parliaments (Part 1) before considering legislation before the Western Australian Parliament (Part 2). It finds significant difficulties and concludes that all legislation relating to COVID-19 currently before any parliament in Australia must be voted down to avoid loss of country, state and individual autonomy/ sovereignty. This conclusion is based upon the principle that coercive control of one entity by another, whether state, corporate or individual, does not advance the common good and is open to nefarious manipulation by external actors. ‘Common good’ that harms any/ many is not for the common good. [Note: The Queensland legislation may be voted on in the Queensland Parliament on 11 October. I suggest people throughout the state email the link to this blog to their local member (whatever their party) and make an appointment to go see them about it before then, to bring it to their attention, overviewing it for them and urgin...