Bay v AHPRA - Avoiding administrative coups

The Supreme Court decision Bay v Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency [2024] QSC 315 on Friday 13 December 2024 was highly significant for the whole country, as it effectively put the brakes on bureaucracy getting out of control, acting outside the law and the constitution and carrying on with misplaced ideological, moralistic zeal, acting as Judge, Jury and executioner. It reaffirmed the need for separation of powers in our democratic governance. Justice Bradley simply asserted the authority of the courts and the law, which we all, including AHPRA need to abide by. AHPRA exceeded these bounds so grossly that the Judge didn’t even need to get into (the now well-researched and documented dangers of, or the fraud surrounding) the C-19 jabs. Our system is supposed to guard against the tyranny of groupthink inducing summary emotion-based action by ideological hot-heads, turning democracy into tyranny. It has finally delivered the required check/ balance.

This decision also sends a clear warning to bureaucrats and managements wanting to override inconvenient ethical decisions of independent practising professionals in every field, including medicine and law. It is a clear message for them to stop meddling in fields they actually know little about and get back into their own administrative box. They might feel superior because of knowing some management processes that apply universally, but process and content are two different things. Adapting process to content is a job for the specialists and practitioners, not the management generalists. Great sounding general rules can easily founder on the content specifics. Ramming them through regardless only generates disaster. Then ignorance of that leads to vigorous management attempts to avoid accountability! 

Friday’s decision also put a stop to democracy being completely overridden by service providers and unelected operatives making arbitrary (and false, as we now know) judgements, thinking they were (or were attempting to become) our moralistic masters. This type of thinking facilitated what South Australian Retired Circuit Court Judge Stuart Lindsay labelled as the pandemic ‘flu-de-tat’ upon our government, in commenting on this very decision at https://markneugebauer.substack.com/p/south-australian-retired-circuit . Our CHOs and CMOs with their titles and qualifications hid the fact that, as far as management of a state or a nation was concerned, they were all out on their work experience placements with their trainer wheels on, while everyone else who knew what they were doing was forced to down tools and leave them to it! What better conditions could you have had to stage a peaceful, bloodless, administrative coup!

Hopefully this decision also puts a roadblock in front of the unelected WEF and its UN/ WHO cronies which have been using exactly these tactics to stage a coup on the governments, police and militaries of the world through various means. These have including PPPs, which just enable large multi-national corporations to buy governments, along with their coffers, coppers, resources and soldiers. This has occurred right under the noses of our sleeping politicians who, incredibly still seem to believe that they and their Parliaments and democracy are somehow in control. They have been persuaded via their subverted party ideologies and small-scale thinking into not comprehending the white anting going on all around them.

Our politicians seem to have been unaware of this mechanism of conducting a coup-de-tat, and so have been completely outwitted and outsmarted. They were totally overrun by the C-19 flu-de-tat. What has happened there, and what is still continuing under the auspices of the WHO, is administrative subversion at its finest – trick them all into thinking they are in control, while they don’t realise that the deceptive, fraudulent, false information they’ve been fed from overseas has led them to white-ant themselves.

Subversive Communism has been on a long march through all our political parties and social and religious institutions over the last 100 years, as documented by Geoff McDonald in Red over Black, as well as Jeremey Lee who was warning of it in 1991-see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxG-kAQnfLM . Despite these warnings, our politicians have been caught napping.

This highlights how faulty and dangerous democracy can be when implemented as representative democracy rather than as direct democracy. Our politicians have been completely asleep, lulled into a false sense of security by half-truths and Trojan Horses put up by those focused on subversion, who have manipulated them at will, generating fake conflicts to cause as much confusion as possible to divide and conquer so that those who control through either secret society oath or ideology can do whatever they want - and consequently bring about the eugenics that has followed past glorious revolutions.

Many of us, including those who have immigrated here after escaping totalitarian regimes, whether they be Fascist, Nazi, Communist or just dictatorial, have recognised that we, in 2024, have come perilously close to the situation Hitler had Germany in before WW2, when its democracy was subverted into war, and dobbers and bureaucrats effectively had the power to imprison and exterminate. This is why the path that AHPRA had been going down was so dangerous. Those who ignore history are bound to repeat it. When we are being told to shut up, do what we’re told, don’t ask questions or we’ll sack you, starve you and exclude you from everywhere, how can anyone with any knowledge of history not have recognised this as Nazism/ Fascism/ Communism, united in glorious totalitarianism? It takes a huge premeditated psychological operation to bring that about. The psychological influencing tools available now are far more advanced, subtle, sneaky and terrible than the propaganda techniques Hitler used. He didn’t have MKUltra or electronic or microwave mind control!

Our politicians have been anaesthetised by the slick overseas sourced big pharma/ media propaganda and their capture of public servants as well as public and private institutions. Of course, some of them have had their egos stroked through having been groomed from a young age as Klaus’s young world leaders. This has turned them into attack dogs for private sector fraud and profit, which you would at least have expected those on the Labor side to have woken up to on behalf of the workers being defrauded. Ah subversion is such a magical thing! And then we expect them to ‘represent’ us? No, our pollies have been just as susceptible to the world-wide WEF coordinated psychological operation as anyone else and have been no less gullible.

The Achillies heel of representative democracy is that it provides no way of countering subversion. The supposed will of the people is so easily conflated/ corrupted into what most people selfishly want right now. When that is equated with whatever’s most convenient for now (or supports whatever shallowly reasoned principle that serves generation of confusion in support of the glorious revolution where workers can supposedly live in utopia, owning nothing and being happy and controllable), then the long term considerations for the benefit of people, land, plants and animals just go straight out the window, and the subversives get the confusion they are seeking in their push toward their utopian mirage.

When so many official measures fly in the face of the people’s wishes and common sense, it is abundantly clear that our current system of government and governance has come very close to failure. Friday’s Supreme Court decision has hopefully arrived just in the nick of time to save us.

We need to learn from this, so we don’t repeat history again. We desperately need some way of holding our governments and our media to account so that when our politicians are hoodwinked en-masse, there is a more timely way of bringing them back to reality. Direct democracy would do that. It would provide for quarterly people-initiated referenda on pre-determined dates that would be held only if there were issues needing the people to decide, or if there had been egregious (rushed? inappropriate?) legislation passed requiring veto.

There would need to be a minimum threshold number of signatures to trigger this, small enough to be achievable for those not politically connected and large enough to exclude frivolous issues. 0.1% of the population would be appropriate, which for Australia would be 26,000. This is well above the level of triviality and sufficiently difficult for any single person to reach, without pushing it into the realm of organisation that only well established and well-funded political parties could reach. Australia is large and sparsely populated, making it more difficult to organise and communicate, and so a higher number would be less appropriate for our geography and distribution.

This would put a stop to the shenanigans of parliamentary tactics and deals determining what the people will have to accept. It would mean we would no longer have to live in fear of whatever ideological stupidity the left or right or some pressure group might try to push people into, as there would be a regular means of preventing that. It would prevent our servants turning themselves into our masters/ rulers. It would make politicians responsible to all Australians, not just big business, unions and pressure groups.

It would also prevent ideologues who gain power forcing social engineering change by legislation. It would compel them to do it by proper consultative means, engaging with the collective mind to test the ideas, rather than implementing ideological edicts. It would encourage a reduction in unnecessary legislation and provide impetus to Kerry Packer’s suggestion that Parliaments be required to find legislation to repeal before introducing any new legislation.

Passing a referendum to change the Constitution to bring this in would give us all a real, timely and effective voice! There would be nothing for we the people to lose, so it shouldn’t be too hard to get the necessary support to win.

Steve McGrath PhD